Procedimiento de Evaluación por Pares

Peer Review Process

The journal implements a rigorous double-blind peer review system to ensure impartiality and academic integrity.

Minimum number of reviewers: Each manuscript is evaluated by at least two independent experts with proven academic experience in the relevant field of knowledge.

Evaluation criteria: Reviewers assess manuscripts based on originality, methodological rigor, contribution to knowledge, clarity of presentation, ethical compliance, and alignment with the journal’s scope.

Editorial decisions: Based on the reviewers’ reports, the Editor-in-Chief, in consultation with the Editorial Board, may issue one of the following decisions:

• Accept without modifications

• Accept with minor revisions

• Request major revisions and resubmission

• Reject

Review timeframes: The journal maintains an efficient editorial workflow, with an average review time of 6 to 8 weeks from submission to the first editorial decision, in line with international publishing standards.

This process ensures transparency, accountability, and quality control, meeting the requirements of leading international indexing systems